Who argued that unionism is bad and that US workers are already treated well?

Henry Clews was a prominent American banker and financial writer during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and he often expressed strong opinions on various economic issues. He argued that unionism was detrimental to the economy and that American workers were generally well treated, which aligns with the sentiment reflected in the question. Clews believed that organized labor could disrupt the balance of the labor market and interfere with business operations, advocating for a more laissez-faire approach to labor relations. His perspective emphasized the idea that economic conditions and opportunities for workers were satisfactory enough that the need for unions was diminished.

In contrast, figures like Samuel Gompers, who was a prominent labor leader and the founder of the American Federation of Labor, strongly advocated for labor rights and the necessity of unions to improve workers' conditions. Horatio Alger was known for his stories about rags-to-riches success, often promoting the idea of individual hard work leading to success rather than commenting directly on unionism. Frank Norris was a novelist who focused on the impact of societal forces on individuals and did not specifically promote the idea that unions were negative for workers. Each of these alternative figures had different perspectives on labor, which highlights the distinct position that Henry Clews held regarding the treatment of workers