Which form of democracy advocated for leadership by the most capable individuals rather than by the common man?

The answer highlights a key aspect of Jeffersonian Democracy, which emphasized the belief that the leadership should be in the hands of educated and capable individuals, particularly those who owned property and had a stake in society. Thomas Jefferson, a proponent of this view, believed that governance should be conducted by an elite of knowledgeable and virtuous leaders who could best serve the interests of the nation. This concept contrasts sharply with the more populist approaches of other forms of democracy, which often prioritize broader participation from the general populace, regardless of their education or societal status.

Jefferson's perspective emerged from his fears of unchecked majority rule, which he believed could lead to tyranny of the majority and the oppression of minority viewpoints. In this context, he championed a government led by those who possessed a deeper understanding of politics, policy, and governance, thus attempting to ensure stability and informed decision-making in leadership.

In contrast, Jacksonian Democracy, which arose later, celebrated the role of the common man in government and advocated for increased suffrage and participation. Social Democracy and Radical Democracy similarly focus more on egalitarian principles and broader participatory governance, moving away from the elitist perspectives found in Jeffersonian thought. This distinction clarifies why Jeffersonian Democracy can be seen as favor